Gary Oliver
Senior Clerk
+44 (0) 207 822 7325
Tom takes instructions in all the main areas of chambers’ practice. He has experience of all levels of the English court and tribunal system, as well as of domestic and international arbitration (including CAS), the European Court of Human Rights, the CJEU, and the courts of numerous British Overseas Territories and other jurisdictions such as the Dubai International Financial Centre. He acts regularly in cases of all types, from fast-paced injunctive proceedings to complex and multijurisdictional strategic litigation.
The main focus of Tom’s practice is public and commercial law, with a particular emphasis on media and entertainment.
He has been recognised as a leading junior in Chambers UK and Legal 500 for several years for his expertise in information technology, intellectual property and media and entertainment. Recent comments include:
Tom is Junior Counsel to the Crown (‘B’ Panel) and is a member of the Treasury Solicitor’s ‘C’ Panel. He also served as a member of the Council of the human rights group Liberty from 2010 until 2018.
Tom has acted in a number of important and high-profile public law disputes, for claimants and defendants.
His clients have included campaign groups (such as Privacy International and the Good Law Project), industry groups (such as UK Music), and individuals. He also regularly advises government bodies and regulators, including in a non-litigation context. His clients have included Ofgem, the FCA, the Gambling Commission, the Environment Agency, and other UK public authorities.
He has conducted training in public law and financial services law for the Dubai Financial Services Authority, for whom he has acted on several occasions. He also spent several months on secondment to Ofgem (the gas and electricity regulator) advising on issues of public and European law.
Tom also has a particular interest in civil liberties and human rights: see the separate section below.
“He is lovely to work with, very clever and works extremely hard.”
Legal 500, 2022
“He is lovely to work with, very clever and works extremely hard.”
Legal 500, 2021
Acting for The Rt Hon Sir John Major KGCH in a challenge to the Prime Minister's decision to advise the monarch to prorogue Parliament in September 2019.
Acted for Privacy International in a major constitutional case concerning the effectiveness of a statutory "ouster" clause purporting to prevent judicial review of decisions of the Investigatory Powers Tribunal.
The case now continues in the Administrative Court on the question of the lawfulness of powers in the Intelligence Services Act 1994 as applied to computer network exploitation (i.e. hacking) by the intelligence services.
Acting for the Good Law Project in a judicial review of the Electoral Commission's interpretation of the statutory rules governing expenditure in referendums: in particular, whether the Electoral Commission is correct that Vote Leave was not required to count towards its expenditure limit some £650,000 which it spent on advertising services provided to another 'Leave' campaigner.
Acted for the Good Law Project in a judicial review concerning the Electoral Commission's failure to investigate a large donation made to the DUP shortly before the 2016 EU Referendum, which would would have been by far the largest political donation in Northern Irish history, but the majority of which appeared to have been spent on newspaper advertising in London without ever reaching the DUP at all.
The case raised important issues concerning the potential abuse of laws permitting donors to Northern Irish political parties to keep their identities secret.
Acting for the Defendant in a dispute about the lawfulness of the local housing authority's recovery of water charges in excess of the amount paid to the water undertaker (raising issues as to compliance with the Water Resale Order 2006).
Acting for Omega Flex Ltd in trademark invalidation proceedings concerning the 'Kitemark', raising an important issue about the statutory framework governing different types of trade mark. The BSI had re-registered the Kitemark (a well-known certification mark) as an ordinary trade mark, meaning it was subject to far fewer rules governing its use. Omega Flex contended that its reputation as a certification mark made it incapable of serving as a badge of origin. The application resulted in the invalidation of the Kitemark in respect of all goods and almost all services in respect of which it had been registered.
Acted for BEIS in a dispute about the alleged infringement of a green Union Flag trademark belonging to Ecotricity.
Acting for the Secretary of State for Health in resisting a challenge to a major decision concerning community pharmacy funding. Now the leading case on the Secretary of State’s statutory duties in relation to the NHS.
Acted for BEIS in a nine-figure damages claim arising from a decision to consult on a proposal to reduce solar subsidies, which decision was alleged to have infringed the Claimants’ rights under Article 1 of the First Protocol to the ECHR and to have caused enormous consequential losses.
A challenge to the decision to introduce a private copying exception without making any provision for compensation to rightholders. Resulted in the quashing of regulations on grounds of illegality.
AA harassment claim brought by a former IFA against the Financial Conduct Authority in respect of regulatory activity carried out in relation to him.
A judicial review claim brought by an individual against the Financial Conduct Authority in respect of its alleged failure to regulate a currency exchange firm.
A statutory appeal against a decision to impose conditions on a doctor’s registration, raising issues about the proper application of the power to impose conditions where those conditions would arguably be tantamount to outright suspension.
A judicial review claim brought by a dentist in respect of a finding that her fitness to practise was impaired, raising issues about the circumstances in which a decision can be quashed for irrationality on the grounds of alleged errors of internal logic.
Two challenges to decisions of the British Psychoanalytic Council on behalf of psychotherapists subject to disciplinary action, raising issues about the susceptibility of the BPC’s decisions to judicial review.
A challenge to the Gambling (Licensing and Advertising) Act 2014 on grounds of noncompliance with EU free movement law.
Acted for Natural England in various judicial review claims concerning its decisions to permit badger culls in Gloucestershire, Somerset, and Dorset in 2013-2015.
A challenge to the proposed reinterment of King Richard III in Leicester Cathedral.
A case before the DIFC Court concerning the DFSA’s powers to compel the production of information (raising issues of Swiss banking law).
Acted for the Environment Agency in a series of disputes (including judicial review proceedings and a statutory appeal) concerning its decisions in relation to two applications to build a hydroelectric power facility at Avoncliff.
A dispute about whether a retrospective tax imposed by a foreign government is consistent with the terms of a bilateral investment treaty.
A claim by a hedge-fund billionaire against his former business partner (and estranged wife) concerning allegedly illegal surveillance commissioned by her, raising issues of privacy under Article 8, and of litigation privilege and privilege against self-incrimination in relation to the products of the surveillance.
A challenge to the validity of the election of Tara Rivers, the Cayman Islands Minister of Education, Employment and Gender Affairs. The leading case on electoral challenges in British Overseas Territories.
A challenge in the Eastern Caribbean Supreme Court to the BVI Governor’s proposed extradition of four alleged drug smugglers to the United States.
A case before the Court of Appeal of Bermuda concerning an attempt by the Minister of Finance to compel Bunge Ltd to provide information to the Argentinian Government pursuant to a request made under an international treaty.
A case before the Court of Appeal of Bermuda concerning the interpretation of the Land Valuation and Tax Act 1967 to a property owned by the husband of the former Premier of Bermuda.
A dispute about whether the cost of an increase in pension contributions was to be borne by the PCT or by practitioners.
The first ever case before the Dubai Financial Markets Tribunal, and the first ever appeal from that Tribunal to the DIFC Court.
A challenge to the Justice Secretary’s refusal to allow the BBC to film an interview with the prisoner Babar Ahmad for broadcast.
Part of a team involved for the Secretary of State in resisting a collateral challenge to the lawfulness of amendments made to the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 using powers under the European Communities Act 1972.
Part of a team involved in a judicial review of the anti-filesharing provisions of the Digital Economy Act 2010.
As well as dealing with human rights law regularly in his other work (in particular his public law and media law work), Tom regularly acts in cases revolving around civil liberties, and has a strong academic and personal interest in the subject.
Before starting pupillage Tom volunteered in the Advice and Information department of human rights group Liberty, advising members of the public on questions of human rights law. He also served four terms as a member of Liberty's Council from 2010 until 2018.
Acted for Privacy International in a major constitutional case concerning the effectiveness of a statutory "ouster" clause purporting to prevent judicial review of decisions of the Investigatory Powers Tribunal.
The case now continues in the Administrative Court on the question of the lawfulness of powers in the Intelligence Services Act 1994 as applied to computer network exploitation (i.e. hacking) by the intelligence services.
A challenge before the Grand Chamber of the European Court of Human Rights concerning a civilian interned in Iraq in April 2003 and later found dead. The leading international case on the application of international human rights law during armed conflict.
A challenge under the Constitution of Singapore to the lawfulness of the criminalisation of male homosexual acts under s 377A of the Singapore Penal Code.
A challenge to the Justice Secretary’s refusal to allow the BBC to film an interview with the prisoner Babar Ahmad for broadcast.
Tom has experience of a range of large and complex commercial cases, often with a substantial international element. As well as working as part of large teams on multi-billion-dollar litigation, he regularly acts as sole counsel.
He has particular experience of ex parte relief such as search orders and freezing orders.
“"A man with an enormous brain who spots things others can't."”
Chambers and Partners, 2023
“"Tom is an extremely bright and able barrister."”
Chambers and Partners, 2023
Acting for Ocado in a high-profile claim against one of its original founders, raising allegations of misuse of confidential information and of deletion of relevant documents in breach of a Search Order.
Also defending a counterclaim (said to be worth hundreds of millions) by the defendants, raising allegations of conspiracy between Ocado and Marks & Spencer to damage the defendants' business by obtaining the Search Orders.
Acting for the Claimants in a large dispute (encompassing a Commercial Court claim and an LCIA arbitration) concerning the management of the estate of the deceased Georgian billionaire Arkadi Patarkatsishvili.
Acting for TRP in a claim concerning the sale of information about horseracing to bookmakers, raising important issues of law about breach of confidence, database rights, and unlawful means conspiracy.
Acting for Travel Counsellors Ltd in a dispute concerning the alleged misuse of confidential information.
A number of claims brought by investors in various ‘Ingenious Group’ film and video game investment schemes, following decisions by HMRC as to the correct tax treatment of those schemes.
Acting for the songwriter Amy Wadge in a dispute concerning management commission, in particular arising from the Grammy-Award-winning song "Thinking Out Loud", co-written with and released by Ed Sheeran.
Acting for a prominent football club in an arbitration against another prominent club in a dispute concerning a fee due on the resale of a player.
Acting for the Defendant in a dispute about the lawfulness of the local housing authority's recovery of water charges in excess of the amount paid to the water undertaker (raising issues as to compliance with the Water Resale Order 2006).
Acting for a company and a shareholder in a dispute concerning the true ownership of 48.5% of the company's shares.
Acting for Richards & Appleby in a claim concerning the apparently fraudulent misselling of a utilities contract.
Acted for the Government of the Maldives in a series of disputes, including a $1.4bn UNCITRAL arbitration, concerning the development and operation of the main international airport of the Maldives.
Acted for Kofi Esson, one of the founders of Sabre Oil and Gas, in a dispute about the profits arising from an oil concession in Ghana.
Acted as sole counsel for Opengenius in proceedings against Tony Buzan, media personality and populariser of “mind mapping”, concerning breaches of contract. The case has involved an interim injunction and breaches of a court order by the defendant, and has set an important precedent about the circumstances in which undertakings can be converted into an order.
Acted as sole counsel for Betclic, an online gambling operator, in a dispute with Worldpay about the recoverability under a contract of indemnity of sums paid under Belgian law in quasi-settlement of a criminal charge.
The case raised a novel issue of law about the interaction of English public policy (concerning the irrecoverability of criminal penalties) with the law of Belgium (where it is possible to ‘settle’ a criminal charge by paying a sum determined by the prosecutor, without admission of liability).
Acted for BEIS in a nine-figure damages claim arising from a decision to consult on a proposal to reduce solar subsidies, which decision was alleged to have infringed the Claimants’ rights under Article 1 of the First Protocol to the ECHR and to have caused enormous consequential losses.
A dispute about liability of individual directors for losses caused by the collapse of Cattles, a major subprime lender, in 2009.
A £500m dispute between Merrill Lynch and a company owned by the Tchenguiz Family Trust, raising allegations of market manipulation and interest rate fixing.
A number of disputes across various jurisdictions involving questions of BVI partnership law, contractual construction and allegations of breach of duty, computer hacking and breach of confidence.
A dispute between two wealthy individuals about the sale of their former matrimonial home by one of them to a company owned by her new partner (the footballer Cesc Fabregas), raising issues concerning fiduciary duties and res judicata.
A High Court claim concerning allegations of a multi-million-dollar fraud perpetrated on Jose Cuervo by its former UK accountant.
A dispute between two foreign exchange traders concerning an alleged team move.
A dispute between an Italian manufacturer and its New York licensee, raising issues of forum conveniens and whether there is a discretion to stay proceedings under the Brussels Regulation in favour of proceedings in a non-Member State.
A claim by a foreign exchange broker in respect of millions of pounds lent by its Head of Risk, allegedly without authorisation, to the failing A1 Grand Prix.
A claim by Kaplan against its former Head of Business Development who left to join the rival education provider BPP and who was suspected to have taken confidential information with him.
A cross-border dispute about the suspension by Google of advertising revenue earned through the AdSense programme.
A dispute between members of the Al-Hasawi family, owners of Nottingham Forest FC, in respect of alleged breaches of fiduciary duty in the management of property investments.
Part of the Defendant’s counsel team in a multi-billion-dollar claim concerning the ownership of Rusal and allegations of criminality in 1990s Russia.
A claim in respect of a major supplier’s allegedly fraudulent misuse of a special discount on supplies in order to undercut market prices.
The first ever case before the Dubai Financial Markets Tribunal, and the first ever appeal from that Tribunal to the DIFC Court.
Contempt of court proceedings in the long-running dispute between Munib Masri and the Consolidated Contractors group of companies.
Tom regularly acts for media law clients in a range of contexts, both advisory and litigious, and in various courts and arbitral tribunals.
He is rapidly becoming one of the country’s leading barristers in the field of interactive entertainment, combining interest and expertise in the relevant law with a thorough awareness of the industry and its needs. He has advised and represented a range of publishers (such as Sony Computer Entertainment Europe and Bandai Namco) and developers (such as Doublesix and Sumo Digital).
He also has a great deal of experience in relation to music, film and TV, with his clients having included the BFI, the BBC, ITV, Rihanna, and members of One Direction. He is a particular authority on difficult issues of film copyright, having advised a number of clients on chain-of-title issues and copyright under predecessor legislation.
Tom occasionally writes as a videogame historian. His article Videogames and the English Courts was published by Read-Only Memory in 2015.
“"He is a rising star."”
Chambers and Partners, 2023
“"Tom gives clear advice and is very good at drafting."”
Chambers and Partners, 2022
“Tom is commercial and pragmatic with an ability to dissect complicated points of law for clients.”
Legal 500, 2023
“He gets to the heart of things quickly, is very thorough and thoughtful, and comes up with solutions.”
Chambers and Partners, 2022
“He's really personable and combines a serious intellect with a very approachable and friendly demeanour.”
Chambers and Partners, 2021
“He is a pleasure to work with.”
Chambers and Partners, 2021
“He's amazing. He's incredibly bright, incredibly knowledgeable and writes brilliantly.”
Chambers and Partners, 2021
“Very pleasant and sensible and has a good knowledge of jurisdictional issues.”
Chambers and Partners, 2021
“He has more industry knowledge about digital entertainment than any other barrister we have worked with.”
Legal 500, 2021
“He's extremely bright and can pick up issues within minutes.”
Chambers and Partners, 2020
“He is calm, considered and intimately knowledgeable about video game industry matters.”
Chambers and Partners, 2020
“He is the go to barrister for interactive entertainment matters.”
Legal 5--, 2019
“His expertise in IP and technology matters is very impressive.”
Chambers and Partners, 2019
“He is incredibly smart.”
Chambers and Partners, 2019
“He is very clever and very tech-savvy.”
Chambers and Partners, 2019
“He is very personable and easy to work with.”
Chambers and Partners, 2019
“One of the leading juniors in the area of media and entertainment.”
Chambers UK, 2018
“An intelligent and extremely capable junior.”
Chambers UK, 2018
“He is extremely efficient with a great grasp of detail.”
Legal 500, 2018
“He is a go-to barrister on video games and digital entertainment matters. He is calm, considered and intimately knowledgeable about video games industry matters”
Chambers UK, 2017
“A calm and thorough advocate.”
Legal 500, 2017
“A highly intelligent barrister, who is capable of grasping issues very quickly”
Legal 500, 2016
Acting for the founder and frontman of the band 'Cradle of Filth' in a dispute with a former manager.
Acting for the songwriter Amy Wadge in a dispute concerning management commission, in particular arising from the Grammy-Award-winning song "Thinking Out Loud", co-written with and released by Ed Sheeran.
Acting for Omega Flex Ltd in trademark invalidation proceedings concerning the 'Kitemark', raising an important issue about the statutory framework governing different types of trade mark. The BSI had re-registered the Kitemark (a well-known certification mark) as an ordinary trade mark, meaning it was subject to far fewer rules governing its use. Omega Flex contended that its reputation as a certification mark made it incapable of serving as a badge of origin. The application resulted in the invalidation of the Kitemark in respect of all goods and almost all services in respect of which it had been registered.
Acting for a collecting society in a dispute with another collecting society concerning their entitlement to share in the proceeds of a copyright licensing scheme.
Acting for TRP in a claim concerning the sale of information about horseracing to bookmakers, raising important issues of law about breach of confidence, database rights, and unlawful means conspiracy.
Acting as sole counsel for Monaco Telecom in a dispute about alleged copying of a website for the purposes of generating advertising revenue. Raises important issues about the English courts’ jurisdiction in respect of acts of copyright infringement taking place online which are alleged to have effects worldwide.
Acted as sole counsel for members of the bands Joy Division and New Order in claims against their former bassist, Peter Hook, arising out of infringements of intellectual property in artworks and sound recordings by his new band “Peter Hook & The Light”.
Acted as sole counsel for members of the bands Joy Division and New Order in claims against their former bassist, Peter Hook, arising out of infringements of intellectual property in artworks and sound recordings by his new band “Peter Hook & The Light”.
Acted as sole counsel for Opengenius in proceedings against Tony Buzan, media personality and populariser of “mind mapping”, concerning breaches of contract. The case has involved an interim injunction and breaches of a court order by the defendant, and has set an important precedent about the circumstances in which undertakings can be converted into an order.
A High Court dispute about the development of the aborted FPS game ‘Rift’.
A dispute about the release and alleged underperformance of ‘Nehruviandoom’, a collaborative studio album by hip hop artists MF Doom and Bishop Nehru.
A High Court dispute about an article published in The Sun about the Claimant, a warship commander, allegedly on the basis of information leaked by a rogue employee at the MOD’s Permanent Joint Headquarters.
A High Court dispute between the band Radiohead and their original record label about the proper royalty payable in respect of digital exploitation of their works under a contract agreed in 1992.
Acting for numerous musicians (including Sam Smith, Eliza Doolittle, and the bands Disclosure and AlunaGeorge) in a claim by an individual for infringement of copyright in lyrics allegedly written by her in a notebook years before but subsequently lost.
A High Court dispute concerning the rights to the source code in respect of a video-on-demand platform, encompassing issues about compliance with court orders for delivery up of source code.
A dispute in the Copyright Tribunal about fees charged to ITV for the use of music in its programming.
Acted for Blue Mountain Music in a dispute about the copyright in thirteen works composed by Bob Marley but falsely attributed to others, including ‘No Woman No Cry’.
A dispute about copyright in relation to the film ‘Bhopal: A Prayer for Rain’, raising issues about the proper application of the IPEC costs rules relating to unreasonable behaviour.
A High Court dispute about royalties in relation to the game Strike Suit Zero, raising issues such as whether backing a game on Kickstarter in return for the promise of a copy amounts to a ‘sale’.
A dispute in the Copyright Tribunal about the application of the tariff governing the use of music by Cineworld.
A High Court dispute between Lily Allen and her former manager.
An LCIA arbitration about the development of a racing game for PS3 and Xbox 360.
A High Court dispute between Jodie Marsh and her former manager about allegedly overclaimed commission.
A dispute about the distribution of TV channels including the Discovery Channel in Bulgaria.
A claim by Gordon Ramsay against one of a number of alleged co-conspirators in a campaign of email hacking and interference with his business, and a counterclaim in respect of alleged misuse of private information.
A claim against Gordon Ramsay’s former public relations adviser in respect of an alleged conspiracy to leak private photographs and medical information obtained through email hacking.
A dispute about the authorship of, and copyright in, Death in Vegas’s 1999 track “Dirge”.
A challenge to the Justice Secretary’s refusal to allow the BBC to film an interview with the prisoner Babar Ahmad for broadcast.
An application by Avicii for an injunction to prevent the release of Leona Lewis’s single ‘Collide’ on grounds of copyright infringement.
A contractual dispute arising out of a track on Dizzee Rascal’s fourth album, Tongue N’ Cheek.
In addition to his extensive work in connection with the media industries (see the separate section above for details), which regularly raises IP issues, Tom has expertise of various other aspects of intellectual property law.
“Super-smart, friendly and easy to work with.”
Legal 500, 2023
“Tom is fantastically sharp and grasps complexity with ease.”
Legal 500, 2021
“Great understanding of how technology and the law work together, and interprets it well for judges. He is very easy to work with, and incredibly hard-working.”
Chambers and Partners, 2020
“He is a rising star in soft IP.”
Legal 500, 2019
“Very knowledgeable and responsive.”
Legal 500, 2018
“A personable, thorough and technologically astute advocate.”
Legal 500, 2017
“Delivers razor-sharp commercial advice with a smile”
Legal 500, 2016
“An IP star of the future.”
Legal 500, 2015
Acting for Omega Flex Ltd in trademark invalidation proceedings concerning the 'Kitemark', raising an important issue about the statutory framework governing different types of trade mark. The BSI had re-registered the Kitemark (a well-known certification mark) as an ordinary trade mark, meaning it was subject to far fewer rules governing its use. Omega Flex contended that its reputation as a certification mark made it incapable of serving as a badge of origin. The application resulted in the invalidation of the Kitemark in respect of all goods and almost all services in respect of which it had been registered.
Acting for Travel Counsellors Ltd in a dispute concerning the alleged misuse of confidential information.
Acted for BEIS in a dispute about the alleged infringement of a green Union Flag trademark belonging to Ecotricity.
Acting as sole counsel for Monaco Telecom in a dispute about alleged copying of a website for the purposes of generating advertising revenue. Raises important issues about the English courts’ jurisdiction in respect of acts of copyright infringement taking place online which are alleged to have effects worldwide.
Acting for a collecting society in a dispute with another collecting society concerning their entitlement to share in the proceeds of a copyright licensing scheme.
Acted for PRS in a dispute in the Chancery Division against all the major UK bookmakers concerning their use of music on gambling terminals on their premises. The case raised an important issue as to the correct approach to calculating damages for copyright infringement where the owner is a collecting society which would only have offered a licence of a wider repertoire on a blanket basis.
Acted for KGL in a dispute concerning the ownership of intellectual property relating to the manufacture and sale of industrial powder processing machinery.
Acted as sole counsel for members of the bands Joy Division and New Order in claims against their former bassist, Peter Hook, arising out of infringements of intellectual property in artworks and sound recordings by his new band “Peter Hook & The Light”.
A dispute over the scope of a pharmaceutical licensing agreement, concerning the circumstances in which an exclusive licence granted in respect of one product will extend to an allegedly new product developed by the licensor.
A dispute in IPEC concerning the use by the Defendant, a provider of recruitment-related services to educational institutions, of a drawing by the Claimant, and award-winning illustrator.
A dispute about the acquisition by an art gallery of works painted by the Claimant on two shipping containers in Poland, raising issues of alleged derogatory treatment by removing them from the site and offering them for sale.
A trademark dispute between Red Bull and a British seller of tobacco-related products.
A dispute about the ownership of the rights to the oldest marine leisure brand in the world.
A dispute about House of Fraser’s use of a logo of a pigeon wearing a bowler hat, said to infringe Jack Wills’s trade mark of a pheasant wearing a top hat.
Tom has represented a wide range of sporting bodies, clubs and players in disputes ranging from commercial (such as contractual or IP disputes) to disciplinary issues. His clients have included the International Cricket Council, Ilie Nastase, the Football Association, and several major English football clubs.
“Tom’s brain works faster than everybody else’s. He sees through complex problems to get to the heart of a point.”
Legal 500, 2023
“Tom’s brain works faster than everybody else’s. He sees through complex problems to get to the heart of a point.”
Legal 500, 2022
“Able to boil down complex abstract ideas into very simple and accessible language.”
Legal 500, 2021
“Really is the go-to set for sports work.”
Legal 500, 2019
“His clarity of thought is extremely impressive”
Legal 500, 2016
“He has a prodigious work rate, and the output of his efforts is consistently impressive.”
Legal 500, 2015
Acting for the FA in a case brought by FIFA concerning the proper interpretation of the Regulations on the Status and Transfer of Players in relation to under-18 players temporarily attending a club on trial.
Acting for a prominent football club in an arbitration against another prominent club in a dispute concerning a fee due on the resale of a player.
Acting for a boxer in a dispute with his former manager about whether or not he should be released from his management agreement.
Acting for a major football club in a dispute about the circumstances in which an academy player was recruited.
Acting for Bolton Wanderers in a dispute about fees allegedly due to a consultant in respect of the identification of possible players.
Acted as sole counsel for the FA in an appeal to the Court of Arbitration for Sport about whether the apparent prohibition in FIFA's Rules on transfers of players aged under 18 from clubs outside the EU to clubs inside the EU is applicable where the player is a national (including a dual national) of a Member State.
Acted for Ilie Năstase, the 1970s tennis legend, in an appeal against a sanction imposed by the ITF arising out of his conduct at a match between Romania and Great Britain in April 2017.
The appeal raised important issues about the proper interpretation of ‘sweep-up’ provisions in a sporting disciplinary policy consistently with the rule against doubtful penalisation, and about the extent to which sanctions imposed in other cases should be taken into account in determining an appropriate sanction.Acting for the beneficial owner of a football club in a dispute concerning whether the FA Rules are binding on him.
Acted for a Championship club in a dispute about fees allegedly due to a consultant in respect of the identification of possible players.
Acted as sole counsel for London Marathon Ltd in a dispute with Liliya Shobukhova, a Russian athlete who won the London Marathon in 2010 but who was later sanctioned for substance abuse by the Russian Athletic Federation in respect of the relevant period.
A dispute between a player and his former management company about money allegedly due under a management agreement
A dispute about loss caused to bookmakers as a result of the mishandling of a race at Ascot in July 2015.
A dispute in CAS between two rival national hockey federations in India about which of them should be recognised by the international federation.
A Rule K dispute about the circumstances in which it is appropriate for a football league to order that a match in respect of which there has been a points deduction should be replayed.
A dispute between two English clubs about the interpretation of a transfer fee agreement, specifically in relation to payments due on a subsequent resale of the player.
A High Court dispute about an allegedly defective pitch covering system supplied to Watford FC.
A Rule K arbitration concerning the length of a player’s suspension for headbutting and grabbing the testicles of a match official.
A High Court dispute about a sponsorship agreement with Scotland’s leading goalkeeper.
A dispute about the London Marathon’s refusal to allow a disabled athlete to participate in the race and the compliance of that decision with equality law.
A dispute before the British Boxing Board of Control concerning Ashley Theophane’s successful defence of the British light welterweight title against Jason Cook.
A dispute before the Court of Arbitration for Sport concerning non-payment of a transfer fee.
Tom has experience of a wide range of European law, particularly EU telecommunications law and competition law. He has been involved not only in EU law challenges in domestic courts but also in prospective challenges to acts of EU institutions.
A challenge to the decision to introduce a private copying exception without making any provision for compensation to rightholders. Resulted in the quashing of regulations on grounds of illegality.
A Francovich damages claim concerning the UK’s implementation of Directive 84/5/EEC, brought by a man seriously injured in a car accident while transporting a large quantity of cannabis for the purpose of supply.
A challenge to the Gambling (Licensing and Advertising) Act 2014 on grounds of noncompliance with EU free movement law.
Part of a team involved for the Secretary of State in resisting a collateral challenge to the lawfulness of amendments made to the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 using powers under the European Communities Act 1972.
Part of a team involved in a judicial review of the anti-filesharing provisions of the Digital Economy Act 2010.
Tom has extensive experience of a wide range of financial services disputes, regularly acting both for and against regulatory bodies.
He has also conducted training in public law and financial services law for the Dubai Financial Services Authority, for whom he has acted on several occasions
Acting for the DFSA in the first contested hearing before the Financial Markets Tribunal, a reference of a Decision Notice concerning an individual .
A number of claims brought by investors in various ‘Ingenious Group’ film and video game investment schemes, following decisions by HMRC as to the correct tax treatment of those schemes.
AA harassment claim brought by a former IFA against the Financial Conduct Authority in respect of regulatory activity carried out in relation to him.
A judicial review claim brought by an individual against the Financial Conduct Authority in respect of its alleged failure to regulate a currency exchange firm.
A case before the DIFC Court concerning the DFSA’s powers to compel the production of information (raising issues of Swiss banking law).
The first ever case before the Dubai Financial Markets Tribunal, and the first ever appeal from that Tribunal to the DIFC Court.
BA Hons History (Cambridge): Starred First, top of year; Graduate Diploma in Law (College of Law): Distinction
Tom worked as a researcher at Unlock Democracy (formerly Charter 88) in 2008, researching and preparing briefing papers on issues of human rights law and constitutional reform.
Tom is a former Trustee and Secretary of the Fitzrovia Neighbourhood Association.
VAT registration number: 997760643
Barristers regulated by the Bar Standards Board
Gary Oliver
Senior Clerk
+44 (0) 207 822 7325
Derek Sutton
Deputy Senior Clerk
+44 (0) 207 822 7327
Adam Sloane
Deputy Senior Clerk
+44 (0) 207 822 7326
Dean Tolman
Clerk
+44 (0) 207 822 7331
Billy Brian
Clerk
+44 (0) 207 822 7339
Marc Armstrong
Clerk
+44 (0) 207 822 7330
Adam Fuschillo
Clerk
+44 (0) 207 822 7329
Danny Compton
Clerk
+44 (0) 207 822 7338
Sophie Reeve
Clerk
+44 (0) 207 822 7324
Rio Sully
Clerk
+44 (0) 207 822 7299